|
DECREE
OF EXCOMMUNICATION PUBLISHED (FULL
TRANSLATION) -- WITH EXPLANATORY NOTE
SIGNIFICANt EXCERPT
“1. The sacred ministers belonging to
the Society of St. Pius X are in schism and
must therefore be considered schismatics (cf.
Ecclesia Dei, 5 c; Pontifical Council for
Legislative Texts, Explanatory Note on the
Excommunication for Schism Incurred by
Adherents of the Movement of Archbishop Marcel
Lefebvre, 24.08.1996, 5-6), and are thus
subject to the excommunication provided for by
law (can. 1364 § 1 CIC).”
“2. As regards the lay faithful, those
who formally adhere to the Society of St. Pius
X under the conditions established in the 1996
Explanatory Note of the Pontifical Council
for Legislative Texts (cf. ibidem, 7) —
which remains in force and which this
Dicastery makes its own — are to be considered
schismatic and excommunicated.”
“3. Finally, the holy People of God
are warned that the sacred ministers of the
Society of St. Pius X unlawfully administer
the sacraments, and that the sacrament of
penance they administer and the marriages they
witness are invalid.”
EDITOR'S NOTE
The 1996 Note's answer, consistent
with general canonical doctrine on formal
adherence to schism, distinguishes between:
Material/passive connection — someone
who attends SSPX Masses out of liturgical
preference, unease with changes since Vatican
II, or simple habit, without positively
embracing the Society's rejection of the
pope's authority. This person is not
excommunicated.
Formal adherence — someone who
deliberately and knowingly joins in the SSPX's
schismatic position itself: actively
supporting the rejection of papal authority,
publicly identifying with the Society's stance
that it may act independently of Rome, or
otherwise manifesting genuine adherence to the
schism as such, not just a preference for the
old liturgy.
The theological principle underneath
this (drawn from general canon law on schism,
e.g. canon 751 and 1364) is that
excommunication for schism requires culpable,
deliberate adherence to the schismatic act or
position — not mere physical presence or
sacramental use. A grandmother going to the
SSPX chapel because it's the only place nearby
with a reverent old Mass, without any
considered rejection of the pope, doesn't meet
the bar. Someone who signs onto SSPX
statements rejecting papal authority, or
otherwise actively identifies with the
Society's schismatic self-understanding, does.
BRIEF HISTORY OF SSPX AND
PAPAL INTERACTIONS
The 1988 break (John Paul
II)
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre founded the
SSPX in 1970 in opposition to the Second
Vatican Council's reforms, particularly on
ecumenism, religious liberty, and the
vernacular Mass. Fearing his movement would
collapse once he died, Lefebvre consecrated
four bishops on June 30, 1988 without papal
mandate. Under canon law this is a schismatic
act carrying automatic ("latae sententiae")
excommunication, and Rome so declared it — the
founding wound between the SSPX and Rome. The
four newly consecrated bishops were Bernard
Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard
Williamson, and Alfonso de Galarreta.
Benedict XVI's rapprochement
attempt
Benedict, long sympathetic to the
traditionalist cause, made two major
overtures:
2007 — Summorum Pontificum,
liberalizing use of the pre-Vatican II Latin
Mass across the whole Church, removing a key
SSPX grievance.
January 2009 — He lifted the 1988
excommunications on the four bishops. This
blew up almost immediately into a PR and
ecumenical crisis because Swiss TV aired an
interview with Bishop Williamson denying the
Holocaust just before the decree became
public. Benedict clarified at the time that
lifting the excommunications did not restore
canonical status: SSPX priests still could not
licitly exercise ministry, and the society
remained in what the Vatican called
"institutional irregularity" rather than full
communion. Doctrinal talks between the SSPX
and the CDF ran 2009–2012 and ultimately
collapsed without an agreement.
|